tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-349616422011-12-28T18:40:21.973-08:00On September 17, the Sacramento Bee posted an editorial in the Opinion section, endorsing Matsui and Lungren for "their local focus and bipartisanship". The statements about Lungren are so ludicrous, that it is hard to take the editorial seriously. But we must. If it is in the media, then <b>it must be true or is it really?</b> Read more at <a href="http://durstonforcongress.blogspot.com/2006/09/sac-bee-distorts-facts.html"> <b>HERE</b></a> and add your comments below.bonniesacnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34961642.post-1159134003874762892006-09-24T14:24:00.000-07:002006-09-30T17:52:24.153-07:00<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>Read the editorial at its original location i<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/24048.html"><strong>These 'rookies' with their focus and bipartisanship deserve re-election</strong></a><strong> or at the <a style="font-weight: normal;" href="http://durstonforcongress.blogspot.com/2006/09/editorial-matsui-and-lungren.html"><span style="font-weight: bold;"> COPY location</span> </a><span style="font-weight: normal;"> and post your mostly unpublished letters or links to supporting documents for Bill or against his "foe" here.</span><br /><br /></strong>The editorial is also posted on Lungren's web page <a href="http://www.danlungren.com/">Dan Lungren for U.S. Congress</a>.<br /><br />It's hard to run on your record when you're are "<strong>rookie</strong>".<br /><br />Anyway - Let's post some good stuff here and spread the word that the Sacramento Bee is misrepresenting facts about Lungren's tenure.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/34961642-115913400387476289?l=durstonforcongress.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>bonniesacnoreply@blogger.com0